<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snakes Gone Wild</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edlink12.net/vcrox/2008/05/16/snakes-gone-wild/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edlink12.net/vcrox/2008/05/16/snakes-gone-wild/</link>
	<description>K-12 Videoconferencing in Texas</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Janine</title>
		<link>http://www.edlink12.net/vcrox/2008/05/16/snakes-gone-wild/#comment-5449</link>
		<dc:creator>Janine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 22:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edlink12.net/vcrox/?p=505#comment-5449</guid>
		<description>Hmm. Have you seen Jan Zanetis' pyramid of types of videoconferences? I'm thinking that maybe there is also a pyramid for the type of interaction as well. I'm hoping this summer to analyze the RAP survey where everyone described the interaction. I think a presentation followed by Q&#38;A would be one of the beginning levels, with dialogue and problem solving like MQ at the higher levels. What do you think? Does Bloom's taxonomy fit in here somewhere too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. Have you seen Jan Zanetis&#8217; pyramid of types of videoconferences? I&#8217;m thinking that maybe there is also a pyramid for the type of interaction as well. I&#8217;m hoping this summer to analyze the RAP survey where everyone described the interaction. I think a presentation followed by Q&amp;A would be one of the beginning levels, with dialogue and problem solving like MQ at the higher levels. What do you think? Does Bloom&#8217;s taxonomy fit in here somewhere too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
